6,000 Ancestral Generations

It is only simple arithmetic but it seems to me quite remarkable that the long journey from the dawn of anatomically modern humans (AMH) some 250,000 years ago, when considered along any particular line of descent, contains not more than some 12,000 individuals. So the right 12,000 names, if I knew them, would suffice to describe all the individuals on any specific line of descent from my origins as an anatomically modern human. Twelve thousand is not so great a number of people. It is less than the population of the little town I live in and it is a number that would be comfortably handled by even quite a small database. I even hear that some people boast more than 12,000 followers on Twitter and others have more than 12,000 “friends” on Facebook! It does not take many minutes to set up an Excel sheet with 12,000 line items, each line then representing one individual on one of my particular lines of descent.

I was 34 years old when my eldest son was born. My father was 37 when I was born. His father – my grandfather – was about 35 when he was born. With his father (my great, grand-father who was born in about 1850) who was about 26 when he was born, I come to the end of the written or verbal history of my descent through my father that is available to me. I take a “generation” to be the time between succeeding births on any direct line of descent. The length of my preceding generations has, no doubt, varied and was most likely distinctly shorter in the past. In my particular case I arbitrarily take the average duration of my preceding generations to have been 21.72 years long. It is a plausible number and while it cannot be proved it is also difficult to refute.

When delving into the fascinating – but arcane – fields of paleo-anthropology and genetics and biology and archeology, I find I am constantly trying to create a narrative which hangs together and looking for the little details which can enable me to personalise and identify with the narrative. It is a search for little “hooks” onto which I can hang my “hats” of understanding. And one such “hook” which both anchors and enables my imagination is that when looked at in the perspective of individuals in a particular line of descent, the ancient past is not as intangible and unreachable as it might seem.

And so let us focus on individuals within the big picture. Around 190,000 – 200,000 years ago, it seems our most recent common matrilineal ancestor – for all 7 billion of us – Mitochondrial Eve – held court in Central/East Africa. I call her M’ytevi. Along my matrilineal line of descent it has needed only 8747 women (give or take a few) to span the generations from M’ytevi (i.e. from my 8,748th Ancestral Generation – AG8748) to my mother. Similarly our most recent common patrilineal ancestor Y’chradam (for Y-chromosomal Adam) can be traced back also to Africa and to around 142,000 years before present (ybp). Here, it has taken just 6,538 men in an unbroken father-to-son line from Y’chradam (AG6538) to me.

And whether it was my long-removed ancestor from my Ancestral Generation AG5064 or one from Ancestral Generation  AG 3220 who crossed the Bab-el-Mandeb is uncertain. But what is certain is that my ancestral patrilineal-father from AG6000 lived in central or East Africa. I call him M’rrgan. 

This blog is for my speculations about the 6,000 generations since M’rrgan.

About ktwop

Scientist, technologist, salesman, manager, executive and now a consultant and author.
This entry was posted in Ancestors, Generations and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to 6,000 Ancestral Generations

  1. Mr WordPress says:

    Hi, this is a comment.
    To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts’ comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.

  2. Richard W. Posner says:

    I came across you “blog” whilst searching for some world population numbers for the late Paleolithic early Mesolithic, before the “invention” of agriculture.

    I suppose it’s a safe guess that you’re more than just a casual “blogger” (scientist, technologist, consultant, author), so you must certainly have “credentials” in the form of a degree or two. Being an autodidact whose highest academic accomplishment is a GED, I hope I’ll not embarrass myself too much by attempting to engage here.

    As it so happens, your purpose in creating this blog is very relevant to my lifelong quest in attempting to understand the human condition and come to terms with humanity’s evident death wish. I haven’t had a chance to read too much yet but I’m inclined to think that what you have to say may be useful in that quest.


  3. ktwop says:

    Your comments are welcome. I am just an amateur but fascinated by the field.

    • Michael says:

      ktwop, thank you for creating this blog. I would like to cite your work. Would you please provide your pen name for citation? Thank you!

      • ktwop says:

        Sure. I am not particularly trying to be anonymous. You can certainly refer to Dr. Krishna Pillai, Sweden though my degrees are in Engineering. History and anthropology are merely amateur interests.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.